Welcome to Orange Frog Productions Owner Section [Banner]

Page Title:

US Domestic Issues
by Bill Sanders - May 15, 2006

Page last updated/all links last verified July 25, 2006

Originally published as part of Great Message Email (Isolationism) in an email to family on 05/11/2006.

NOTE: This page Under Construction/Conversion
This page has not been completely converted to OFPv2 Standards.
When this is completed, this paragraph will go away.
Meanwhile, all external links on this page open a new window.
NOTE: ALL LINKS HAVE NOT BEEN REVERIFIED.

 

Do we need to do more in the US? Yes... Of course. Here are just a few of the "domestic problems" that should and MUST be addressed, and in some cases, my own ideas about solutions:

1) Illegal Immigrants

We have MILLIONS of illegal immigrants (not all Mexican, but they are an extremely large percentage of them) in the US. Mexico and Canada are the only land-borders we have.

Those here illegally MUST comply with our laws, and become legal. Amnesty should only be that they be allowed to register as aliens, and all checks and verifications be performed as if they had crossed legally. This is only for those already here, and only for a period of time. After that period, anyone caught here illegally should be IMMEDIATELY sent back to their country of origin (except those who can prove they are political refugees.) NOTE: Anyone who is here illegally to seek medical help (and not to just give birth to a US Citizen) for something not available in their country of origin should be handled differently.

The first stop for anyone from another country who enters the US should be CUSTOMS and IMMIGRATION.

And one of the laws those seeking permanent allegiance with the US should be that they must learn some form of English. No more multi-language textbooks. No more multi-cultural schools. We are AMERICAN, a multi-cultural society, but as a "melting pot", not a "salad bowl" (as I've seen described elsewhere). If they come and do not wish to become an American Citizen and learn English, they are given Temporary Status and MUST report to someone periodically (think probation). If they've been here temporarily before, and there's been no problem, they can be treated differently. Otherwise...

2) Employment

Unemployment is low at 4.7% in April/May 2006, but think about this: April 2006 statistics show that there are 7,123,000 unemployed workers (16 and up) in the US. Of those 381,000 are discouraged over job prospects.

See tables LNS14000000 (Unemployment Rate), LNS13000000 (Unemployment Levels), and LNU05026645 (Not in Labor Force, Searched For Work and Available, Discouraged Reasons For Not Currently Looking) at U.S. Department of Labor - Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey.

I have a suggestion:

The US COULD employ thousands of them as unarmed border patrol (think Forest Rangers in towers), including physically handicapped, reporting directly to the Border Patrol. Towers (with lifts to allow the physically handicapped to work there) and ADA-compliant cabins/homes could be constructed along both Mexican and Canadian borders (including near the actual border crossings), and with room, board and benefits provided by the government, this could solve two problems at one time!

Other (non- or minorly-handicapped) could be drivers and riders, most trained in tracking and with at least some police training), and

This COULD be set up like the Coast Guard in certain respects ("Border Guard"?) where it counts toward military service (but handicapped and "discouraged workers" get priority), therefore, GI Bill and VA benefits apply.

Training here could/would be minimal - simply watch for and photograph (long-lens capabilities - video and otherwise) people crossing the border where they aren't supposed to and report it, immediately... Oh... And keep an eye out for fires, too.

No one here should do anything alone, There should be at least two in each tower, at least two in each vehicle, at least two... one with at least some "military" and "diplomatic" training. At least ONE of those in each should also have weapons training (personal protection only).

The "on-the-ground" forces should also know different languages (or have translators immediately available on the radio/phone). Non-lethal weapons should be employed, first though. And, while guns should not be employed for most of these, there should be some training in their uses, and they should only be used as last resort weapons (for personal protection). Any "shootings" should be handled like the police do, with police and civilian boards reviewing them.

(To find out how the government calculates and defines the "work force", "employed", "unemployed", "discouraged", etc. workers, see U.S. Department of Labor - How the Government Measures Unemployment)

Oh, and while we're at it, it's WAY past time to raise the minimum wage. $5.15/hour is about $200/week (assuming full-time employment) or around $10,000/year. Take the approximate 20% taxes and other items from it and you get about $8000/year. And we wonder why so many people in America are on Welfare? Why there are so many homeless? Why people can't afford medicines and doctors? Why both parents (and sometimes the kids) work to make ends meet? And MANY places that pay minimum wage or slightly above, DO NOT ALLOW full-time work, because then they may HAVE to pay benefits like health and life insurance. And, God forbid people should work MORE than 40 hours. Some corporations make sure employees are on SALARY (exempt) so they DO NOT HAVE to pay overtime, then REQUIRE it, sometimes by setting deadlines so unrealistically that the only way to get it done by it IS to work overtime. (Indiana is an at-will state, meaning you can quit any time you wish, but the company can terminate you at their own whim at any time. Unions may help this situation and others, but many local unions make so many other stupid demands that many are not trusted any more. For my take on Unions, see my "To Union or Not to Union" piece.)

3) Education

When I grew up, we had "Fun with Dick and Jane" reading, spelling, math, geography, history, occasional gym, music and art classes (the latter two my favorites) and others, and all were taught from separate books. You were "held back" if you didn't "make the grade". While it may have been a "blow" to your ego, it did NOT mean your self-esteem was destroyed. If you didn't/couldn't do the work, you either got "remedial" help the next year for classes you failed (that COULD hurt self-esteem, but you tried even harder to stay out of those classes, and many took them and did extremely well in later classes), you took Summer School to learn what you didn't before, or you retook the whole school year. If a person was OBVIOUSLY smarter than the rest of the class, there was the possibility that he/she would be passed on to the next grade early. There was little worry about the "socialization" skills, because if they didn't "socialize" in with the class and failed, they were "held back". This did not reflect on their character, much.

Now, parents and others expect their children to be able to do what we all did in the 1st or 2nd grade in KINDERGARTEN, if not Pre-School/Day Care! They DEMAND their students be passed on to the next grade even if they don't "cut the mustard," and, if they don't, they will SUE the school system.

"New Math" was the most difficult we had. Now everything seems to be combined. Geography, History, Math and Reading are all in the same books. Kids are expected to be able to spell words we never even knew (internet? computer? divorce? relief? - no it's not "R-o-l-a-i-d-s") not particularly difficult, but do YOU remember having to learn spelling them in 2nd and 3rd grade?)

Bullies were dealt with by bringing their parents in to the principal's office and they and the kids "had a discussion", sometimes with the principal paddling the kids, then and there. Parents defended their kids even then, but you KNOW when they got home, the kids were punished. Principals (and parents) PADDLED children who misbehaved (usually bend over and one thwack with one of those fraternity-type paddles, too), and when a kid "got in trouble" at school, it was NOTHING compared to what they would get at home. I'm sure there were cases where the punisher "went too far" with it, but no one was arrested or sued (that I know of) for child abuse. Now, if a teacher or principal punishes a child (no matter the age, no matter the infraction, and sometimes, no matter the punishment), parents SUE. If a kid mentions that he/she was paddled at home or shows a bruise, even if it's from actually playing outside, the FSSA is called in. Ridiculous.

HOWEVER, child abuse DOES happen - physical, mental, intellectual, spiritual and sexual. There have been enough cases where sometimes the only "friend" a kid has is the teacher or principal. And even principals and teachers (as seen in MANY recent cases) take things to extremes.

Back when I went to school, as we walked home, we discussed how we'd like to get a bottle of nitro and drop it on the school from a helicopter. Now, kids would be suspended or expelled for even mentioning this. (How would a kid get a bottle of nitro and a helicopter?) I used to work at a store after school (from about 5th grade on), stocking shelves and cleaning up. I carried my box-cutter, and as a boy scout there were times I carried my pocket-knife and/or sheathe knife on my belt. Again, now kids are expelled even if they take them directly to the principal's office after accidentally leaving them in their knapsack after a camping trip. I NEVER thought to use either on ANYONE or ANYTHING at school. Why do kids today? And GUNS? We may have talked about those on the way home, too, but we'd never think of actually using them (and most of us had no idea how to get hold of one).

Fighting happened at times (at school and on the way home, and again, we WALKED - about a mile each way), but the kids always got into trouble. Hell, we even got into trouble for messing around wrestling on school grounds after school once. (I was in 4th grade, my brother in 2nd, and most of the friends from my neighborhood were in the same grades.). We had to give up our recesses (one kid took the paddling option!) until we had written 1000 times "I will go straight home after school" and turned them into the principal. (I don't recall actually having written a full 1000 times before the principle "let us off" after a couple of weeks, but believe I had 800 or so. My brother had less, but he was two grades younger. We, of course, never told our parents until we were well past high-school! It was handled at the school. We could have written the sentences at home, but then the chances were that our parents would have found out and WHAM!

Parents, today, MUST work. There's almost no way around it with the costs of food, housing, utilities, vehicles, gas, etc. BUT, they must also spend time with their kids. When our kids were young, our video games were connected to our family TV. We could not afford many, so we got games we as adults liked too, like Mario Brothers and Link/Zelda. We WOULD NOT LET the kids play them more than an hour at a time on school days and were "antsy" about it on weekends, until they reached a certain age. We knew what the games were, and made sure they knew what was real and what was not on TV. (Our generation just KNEW, apparently. Even though we had a few odd people who thought Dungeons and Dragons were "real" at times, we knew ... Maybe this was because there wasn't the (un)realistic blood splashes when people get shot... Maybe it was because when we asked our parents about things they answered us.)

4) Homelessness and Starving People

This is something I don't really know that much about. I've never been homeless and, if you've seen my picture, you can tell I've never really been starving. However, news stories, infomercials, and various other sources point to the problem.

Why isn't there a mandate that a large percentage of the moneys donated to charities that help around the world be spent here in America, until this situation is handled. Maybe this could be tied to the populations involved.

Why do people always say "NIMBY" (Not in My Back Yard) when others come up with a plan to rehab a building that is currently an eye-sore in the neighborhood to make it a shelter? or a low-cost (for those on welfare-only) grocery store? or soup kitchen or other places these people can eat?

There are old school (and other) buildings just outside of many towns across our state (Indiana) and I'm sure there are others near many other cities and towns across the country. Most appear to just be sitting there and rotting. Why can't they be used? Yes... They will need SOME repair, and in many cases, asbestos and lead-paint removal, but ...

We are the richest most powerful nation on earth. There should NOT be ANY homeless people here. There should NOT be any starving children here. I realize that drugs are a major problem in the US (see below), and they MAY cause SOME of these problems. However, consumer debt, especially in the form of high-interest loans and credit cards are the culprits. And in many cases, it's more the "Dick Dastardly" and "Snidely Whiplash" corporate owners, moving to another country, foreclosing on people, etc. Maybe it's time to do something about THEM!

Anyone notice that "back in the day" when you defaulted on a credit card the interest rate ROSE, but usually one 3-5%. Back when the general interest rates were 18% the default percentage was 21%. When general interest rates dropped, the default rate stayed the same. Now I see cases where it's 25-33%! That's LOAN SHARK territory. And all you have to do is be late on a payment ONE TIME (and sometimes not even on THEIR card, but someone else's or some other loan!) No wonder there's so much credit-card debt. No wonder there's so many American's going bankrupt.

5) Drugs

Illegal Drugs

There are so many illegal drugs crossing our borders, in some cases, championed by the countries from which they came, that they are as large-a-problem as the Illegal Immigrant one, if not moreso. Besides that, people are willing to "cook up" their own, sometimes, designer drugs in both large cities and small towns, no matter the danger to the neighborhood, themselves OR their children. Drugs can be passed into and out of prisons seemingly with impunity, and there seems to be little anyone can do about it.

Education about the dangers of making, selling and ingesting these drugs seems to fall on deaf ears. Promises/Threats of taking the dealer's property mean nothing. Promises/Threats of mandatory jail-time mean nothing. "Hiding" the drugs with which stronger drugs are made have just made drug stores and pharmacies targets for armed robberies of these and narcotics, besides requiring the pharmacies to "make room" behind the counter for them. Women (and men) prostitute themselves just to get another fix. Home invasions, usually for money and saleable goods seem to be on the rise.

Solutions? I don't have any. Maybe decimalizing marijuana to the level of alcohol would help, since I don't believe it is the "gateway" drug that it's made out to be. Others, though...

Legal Drugs

I understand why pharmacies must charge so much for some of their drugs. You will too, after reading some of the following:

Basically, a new drug (see 1st link, above, for definition) takes years to find. Once found and developed, it's patented to protect the company's research. Then comes years (up to and even past 10 years) of testing to make sure it works correctly, the side-effects are known, and various other factors. The FDA must spend time reviewing all information gleaned from all prior work on the drug and approve it. After that, it's brought to market (advertised and sold) which DOES require paying for advertising - in pharmacy, doctor, medical and public media. At that point, the company has only 7-10 years to recoup the costs of R&D, development, manufacturing, testing, etc., before the drug can "go" generic, meaning other companies can sell their own versions of the same drug without having to do the research. Many times, even with the (perceived) exorbitant prices, the company LOSES money on any given drug.

My EWAG (Educated-Wild-Assed-Guess) is that the "drug cards" and discounts many of the large companies proffer can be considered "write-offs" on taxes, thereby allowing them to recoup even MORE of the cost.

Medicare has recently (early this year) added "Part D", which helps seniors and other Medicare recipients pay for medicines. HOWEVER, because of the "doughnut", there can still be a significant cost. In my case, I pay a $250 deductible, based on my plan's costs - and it appears they take the largest discounted amounts so it's paid right away. Then when the total cost of my medicines (both mine and the insurer's) reaches a certain amount ($2250), I enter the doughnut or donut hole, where I am now responsible for the full 100% cost of my medicines (at the insurer's discounted prices) until I have paid $3600 total out of my own pocket. At this point, the insurer will pay 95% of the drug costs.

This is expensive. I have seven (7) prescriptions and the doctor keeps wanting to put me on medicines that are either combinations or new, neither of which are on my insurer's formulary. After two three (3) month orders (just 1/2-a-year's worth of prescriptions) I believe I've reached the "doughnut". Considering the costs of some of the medicines during the deductible phase, I don't know that I can afford much more. And, while there may be other insurers I could have used, I like the cost ($101 per month) and medical coverages this one has. I believe my medicines are from different companies, so can't use a single "company" card to lower the costs during the doughnut period, and don't know that they would, because of my insurance, in the first place.

This is also confusing. Hell, my FATHER, who sold insurance for years doesn't understand it. There are MANY insurers helping seniors (and handicapped) with Medicare coverages, and only a VERY few here in Indiana. I had thought I had a good one (and still believe I do), but how am I going to cover my medicines from the next time I order them to the end of the year?

So what do we do? The idea of Part D was to keep the high cost of medicines for seniors from bankrupting them. Personally, I make just enough to cover my own home expenses and the insurance I'm covering. My working wife helps with some of the home expenses, our vehicles, our food and supplies, and her own kids. I don't know where the money will come from to cover the doughnut period.

I have no solutions for these problems.

07/25/2006 Update: I talked to a customer service representative of my insurer, today, about the disparity between drug prices. The mail-order pharmacy they use has an online program to show you the cost and co-pay of your medications, that may or may not be correct (they seem to have a lot of problems with it).

For example for one of my medications, it showed the generic - most of mine are, now - cost of $14 for 90 pills, which seems to be close to "in-line" with other places. HOWEVER, I've been charged over $100 for the same amount. Another is listed as $19.08, again "in-line" with other places, but I was charged about $119.

If you are a senior, or even if you are not, and you can, PLEASE shop around. I found the same disparity between pharmacies. For example, one medication (simple & cheap, according to my doctor) was listed as about $11 at CVS, about $13 at Walgreens, about $24 or $86 ( smiley - confused - Depending on manufacturer!? - Talk about price disparities!) at Costco, and $9 at Drugstore.com. You should also be able to use Drugstore.com, but remember, it's most likely not one of you insurer's selected pharmacies. They MAY count the money you spend there toward your deductible and "doughnut hole". Be sure you check with your insurer for the way they cover pharmacies that are NOT in their plan.

NOTE: I could not check Kroger, Wal-Mart or Sam's Club pharmacy drug prices online... They must be called. And only "popular" drugs are listed by CVS. -bs]

6) Other Medical

Many people cannot afford to go to a doctor. With this "Age of Specialization", many of the family and general practitioners have been basically relegated to the role of "traffic cop", handling minor problems and sending people off to the specialists of the current problem they are having. Of course, the GP/FP is paid for this service, but what that means is that they must quickly diagnose the patient, maybe order lab tests, and "pass them off".

My doctor will answer questions, but even if I don't have any, I could possibly spend an hour or so waiting for him in the waiting room, then I'm led to a small room by his nurse, where she takes my pulse and blood pressure, hears my complaint(s) and leaves. It might be 15-30 minutes later, he appears. He reads his notes, asks a couple of questions, maybe looks at the problem (if it's visible), and seems to head for the door. If I ask a question, he will stop and spend time discussing it with me, but... This is because many of the insurers will only pay him a certain amount, no matter his "normal charges". Of course, he has accepted this price by joining the plan, but to make "doctor's wages", he needs to see as many people as he can on any given day.

Specialists, meanwhile are paid more. Not much (if they are in a plan, and most people can't afford specialists NOT in the plan), but more. They are (normally) willing to spend more time with you, discussing your problem. However, they now have so many people to see, it sometimes takes a couple of weeks just to get in to see them.

We argue that socialized medicine, as in Canada and England doesn't appear to work (or wouldn't for us), but at least they can SEE doctors when they need to, get the drugs and other treatments they need, etc., and they don't go bankrupt paying for medical care.

Again, the cost is high. Even with the insurance we have, it can easily break us (my wife and I) if one of us, especially her (her main insurance is through work) gets sick. AND, what if she actually has to spend time in the hospital? There's loss of income, hospital expenses, doctor bills, prescriptions, etc. And again, Indiana is an "at will" state. Where she works they use "points". Accumulate enough points for missing work or being late, and you're gone. THEN what? Somehow, jobs need to be protected (no matter the state) if a person takes ill. Disability insurance only goes so far.

It takes some people who can no longer work (I would say those with unsympathetic administrators and doctor reviewers) a VERY long time (sometimes years) to get Social Security Disability, sometimes requiring hiring attorneys they can't really afford. Then there's most likely a "waiting period" AFTER your pay stops. Even if you manage to get it, it all depends on how much you've managed to "put away" into Social Security while working over the years. Then, if help is needed to get appliances so you can actually get around without help, THIS can sometimes take years.

I know of other people with back and heart problems, who can no longer work, who have had problems getting help. It appears that back problem disabilities are difficult to diagnose and, in the heart problem case, they supposedly, could do their last job, BASED ON THE TITLE ONLY (which differs from place-to-place, btw), even with their disability. Apparently, if you manage to say the right things the right way and the right people get on your case, there will be fewer problems. Even so, there are delays:

It's been almost three (3) years since I applied to Voc Rehab to help find a job and get a scooter and van modifications because of balance problems, doctors telling me not to walk for more than five (5) minutes at a time (diabetic neuropathy and foot ulcers - I've only got three toes and two toenails left on one foot and the toes on the other foot are GONE) and a blown-out knee that will not bend more than 90 degrees since I fell (see elsewhere on OFP for more on that). I need the van mods so I can "get out" on my own, without help. Another problem is that I am a large person with long legs (6'-9" tall and ... "overweight"), meaning there are only a few vehicles I can actually get into. (Don't send "possibles"... 1) you don't know how many vehicles I've "tried on" over the years; 2) my weight is seldom the problem, it's the "knee-room"; and we managed to get a newer van, earlier this year (see elsewhere on OFP).) The Scooter and Van Mods were listed (along with finding a job or business I could start) in the first meeting I had with the VR counselor.

I got the scooter while I was in the hospital for the knee (just over two (2) years ago), and have FINALLY (earlier this year) been evaluated and gotten my license amended for use of hand-controls in my van. This means I can only drive vehicles with hand-controls. HOWEVER, I STILL need them and a lift for my scooter installed into my van so I can "get around" on my own. During all this waiting for approvals, gas prices have risen from around $1.50 to $3.00 per gallon, which will limit my ability to find a job or start my own possible business (one possible on the latter would require a lot of local travel (no not sales).) Meanwhile, I sit at home, doing genealogy, playing computer games, watching TV, building websites for my family (no pay), and updating my own (for experience, fun and to get articles like this one out there.) Wish I could get paid for that!

Government "Red Tape" needs to be lessened for SS Disability and Voc Rehab services. I understand there are plenty of people out there "cheating" the government, but after having received all medical records from reputable doctors and hospitals, it should be obvious if this is the case. There needs to be more people working in these "evaluation positions". My VR counselor works out of Indy and travels to a couple of Work One sites in Boone. She DOES NOT seem to keep up with her email, and I seem to have to prompt her to get even a "working on it" response; Therefore, maybe all counselors need to be trained in the use of email and other internet capabilities. PLEASE NOTE: I'm not saying she isn't doing a good job. I believe she's overwhelmed by the number of people who need help, and therefore, the number of cases she must deal with.

7) Violence - in general

Personally, I believe that spanking for punishment is not abuse if it's not done much and leaves nothing but a pink butt. HOWEVER, as in everything, too much...

While the lack of any real consequences (time-out? grounded to room with TV/stereo/video-games/phone?) has produced a generation full of angry, rebellious teens, many of whom are gang-members, where when most of our generation stepped out of line there were real (painful) consequences, so we didn't do it again. Many of our generation thought this type of punishment was harsh so stopped spanking our kids, instead using the time-out method.

Think about this: Maybe it's because our generation used time-outs, groundings, TV-as-babysitter, video-games-as-babysitter, etc., and didn't pay as much attention to our kids as our parents did to us for various reasons. Many of us didn't attend church with our families near as often as we did when we were children. Our kids did not have as much "social interaction" with their peers as we did. We used to "play outside" all day with the other kids in the neighborhood without having our parents worry about us being kidnapped. Our families would visit other families and while the parents were talking, playing cards or whatever else they'd do, we'd play with their kids.

Of course, with the rising threat of violence, kidnappings, etc., we thought we were protecting our kids. It does seem that our kids' generation are responsible for much of the violence perpetrated on children. It seems they never learned how to control their anger. Our generation learned that hitting (spanking) caused pain. We played hard and got hurt, and realized other things that could cause pain. Our kids never learned that. Now, kids don't play outside much, spending a large part of their time watching TV and playing video games where people are injured, maimed and killed, and many don't KNOW that it HURTS, and that there are REAL CONSEQUENCES when things like that happen.

I know many kids of our generation (and those before) who wished ill on their parents for all of the consequences we faced at their hands, but except for an exceedingly small number, we never carried out any of the plans. Why? Because somewhere in the back of our minds, we knew they were right most of the time.

8) Etcetera

Oh, the list of "domestic problems" could go on and on.

Spousal Abuse

Women and men both need to be educated that if you are abused in any way by - or abuse (sometimes read as "control") - a spouse, it's not "love". Many women will not press charges because a man "gets upset" at what he did, declares his love and apologizes for hitting her (or more), and her self-esteem is so low that she accepts the situation as "love". The abusers should be locked up and counseled (real counseling) and the abusees should also be taught that love doesn't mean pain.) (See #7 - Violence for more.))

Child abuse (violence)

This type of child abuse seems to be reaching new heights. Kids are being seriously injured and killed by parents and step-parents (sometimes accidentally in the "heat of the moment") at what I see as an alarming rate. I see part of this having to do with the situation mentioned in #7 - Violence, above. Some have to do with the lack of moral training that occurs in church (no matter the religion). Some probably have to do with dropping many of the domestic skills classes (home ec, shop, etc.) in our schools. Still, something needs to be done. Any ideas?

Child abuse (sexual)

This is just sick. I don't know whether it's something that simply was never reported when we were growing up, or something else (internet "teen" porn sites, media reporting has increased, etc.) has made it more prevalent. Unbelievably, Dateline has had numerous shows of men attempting to visit a teen-age girls' (and boys') home (one they "met" over the internet and who they believe to be 14-16 or younger), for sexual purposes. Many of these men actually saw prior shows, and know there are police and other agencies watching the internet for them, and still they showed up. These were (supposedly) teens (and in some countries, this would not be illegal), but younger children are also being abused as well. Again, some of this may have to do with some of the same conditions as causes #7 - Violence (lack of education, lack of church, lack of teaching of the consequences, lack of... you get the idea.) Still and again, something needs to be done. Ideas? (Just remember, in SOME cases, these type of men can be and have been rehabilitated... )

Prison Overcrowding

Maybe work more on actual "rehabilitation" rather than simply "storing" the prisoners somewhere. And, if we know for sure someone performed a "heinous act" (like being caught in the act) and the death penalty's been prescribed by the judge and jury, don't let appeals go on for 10+ years. If things keep going the way they are, at some point an "Escape from New York" scenario (where Manhattan was walled off from the rest of the US and all prisoners were put there) may be about the only thing we can do.

Prejudice

Nothing should be based on sex, race, creed, color, religion, handicap, etc. No matter the religious teachings of (at the very least) tolerance, prejudice is, and probably always will be, a problem with some people. For some reason or other, people can't seem to understand that a human being is a human being. All descend from Adam and Eve, Noah and his children. (If you believe in Evolution, where in the Bible or anywhere else does it say that Adam and Eve were not apes? Does anyone really know "God's likeness?) This means we are all family - the WHOLE HUMAN RACE! Maybe we are extremely distant cousins, but we are all related. There has always been and will always be zealots and those who see otherwise. That does not mean we have to agree with them. (Oh... And women can do anything and be as successful, if not moreso, than some men. While they are "the weaker sex", USUALLY physically, they DO tend to be smarter - I believe they've been valedictorians more than men. And how many men can work 9-5 or stay at home AND teach and raise kids, do the majority of the shopping, cooking, cleaning and everything else that's involved... Not as smart?... or strong? GEEZE!)

Frivolous lawsuits

In this case, my definition of "frivolous" is "stoopid lawsuits" or "lawsuits for stoopid reasons". If it was your own "stoopidity" that caused your physical, mental, or emotional "damage", you have absolutely NO RIGHT to sue ANYONE else. If you don't have the common sense to keep hot coffee from between your legs, that stove tops can get hot, that knives are sharp, that if you fall out of third story window while trying to moon other people, if you eat too much of the "wrong type" of food and get fat, if you lay on the train tracks and get hit, you don't deserve SHIT from ANYONE. They call it "common" sense for a reason... Because it's COMMON KNOWLEDGE (for those that don't understand, it's something EVERYONE knows, or should) that these things can HURT you, and don't do them. (And, by the way... MOST of these are true lawsuits, most have WON... See Power of Attorneys' Stupid Lawsuits, or their Laughable Lawsuits and LegalZoom.com's Top Ten Frivolous Lawsuits for more.)

ATTORNEYS who convince people to file lawsuits should have to pay court costs, a "frivolity" fee (quite large!), the other attorney's fees, etc. when they lose. PEOPLE who sue in small-claims court for "frivolous" reasons and lose, should be made to pay the defendants' expenses (including those in prison). Judges who allow HUGE verdicts for "frivolous" suits should be made to ... any ideas?)

Etc, etc, etc. (for Frivolous lawsuits, et al).

Do I have ideas on what we can do about some of these issues? Yes. On some I have listed ideas. On others, I have "inklings" but nothing concrete, so have not listed them. And on still others, I have absolutely no clue.

If you have an idea that may be acceptable to both political parties and to people of most persuasions, let me know. If they have merit or I feel I need to comment on them, I will publish them on a "feedback" page. Please be sure to refer to the number and heading in your comments. If you do, I can also link them back to this page. And... Remember what I said about "Prejudice"!

by Bill Sanders © May 15, 2006 - email:
 

Send email to Bill Sanders ()
with questions or comments about this page or site.


This site, all text and graphics (unless otherwise noted) on it
were designed, developed and published by Bill Sanders of Orange Frog Productions.
It and it's CSS was validated and complies with both the: CSS and HTML 4.01 validators from W3C.
NOTE: All CSS validates except the "New Window Buttons" which include some invalid code (ie: hacks),
added PicoSearch Tables, and warnings for using transparent backgrounds when color foregrounds defined.

Copyright © 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 by Bill Sanders / Full site last modified: October 21, 2006
Any reproduction, printing, or selling of this content is prohibited without express written consent from William D. Sanders.
ctr